Thursday, November 10, 2011

We're Having a Heat Wave - Stephen Tharp

Stephen Tharp is one of the finest and most exciting concert organists active today.  He has been named International Performer of the Year by the New York Chapter of the American Guild of Organists - part of that honor is his recital on February 19 at 8pm, at St. Mary the Virgin (145 W46th St, New York) - don't miss it.

He is being featured on Pipedreams this week.  Don't miss that, either.

Yesterday I was listening to the recording he made on the famous organ at Haarlem in The Netherlands - what a show - lots of early music, along with some Vierne and a fiery reading of Flor Peeters' Toccata, Fugue, and Hymn.  Don't miss that either (you can order it from JAV recordings).

Last summer Stephen played a recital on the Kotschmar Organ in Portland, Maine - he and his wife Lena stayed with us for a couple days.  I wrote about this in my column In the wind..  in the September issue of THE DIAPASON.  Thought I'd share it with you:


In the wind…

September, 2011

We’re havin’ a heat wave.

It’s hot.  I’m writing in mid-July from the coast of Maine where we usually enjoy cool ocean breezes.  But records are being set.  It was ninety-eight degrees in Portland yesterday and it’s ninety-eight degrees at home today.  I said ocean, didn’t I.  That means humidity.  A few minutes ago, the meteorologist on the radio said the humidity is “about as high as it can go.”  Like most desk-days, I’m talking on the phone with people all over the country, and everyone says it’s terrible today.  Electric utilities are limiting power even though they’re dealing with record high demands.  Hospital emergency rooms are busier than normal.  Several of the church offices I tried to call today had messages on their phones saying they had closed early in order to save energy.

For fun (or longing) I looked at the website of the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to learn that while it’s ninety-eight here, it’s in the high sixties in Nome, Alaska and around seventy in Helena, Montana.  But it’s ninety in Detroit, a hundred-three in New York City and a hundred-four in Gilbertsville, PA.

All those organs sounding terrible.

Many churches have summer schedules during which the organ isn’t used much – a good thing because when the weather gets hot the pitch of flue pipes rises dramatically while the reeds stay right where they are.  I advise clients and resist temptation myself not to raise the pitch of reeds in the summer to match the rest of the organ.  That’s how tuning scrolls get wrecked – you roll them down “into the quick,” as if you were trying to get a carp out of a sardine can, to match the pitch of the flues.  Then in the winter when you try to get the reeds back to usual pitch the scrolls are torn.  When a tuning scroll is damaged and “leaks,” the speech of the pipe is compromised.

If your church has “Church School Sunday” on the first Sunday in June, then summer services in the air-conditioned chapel (pretty common in New England Protestant churches), you’re fine.  I played for almost twenty years at a church with exactly this schedule.  It was a delight because there was no choir in the summer, and the services were an hour earlier.  I was active in a sailing club in those days and we ran races every Sunday, so it was handy to be finished with church at ten-am.  We moved the church’s wonderful piano from the sanctuary to the chapel each year so I could play on a “real” instrument for the summer – a great opportunity to keep my fingers around my piano repertory.  The permanent instrument in the chapel was an aging and low-end electronic organ.  Something about it meant that every A# in all the “stops” was out of tune and the dealer/technician said it couldn’t be fixed.  There was a sprinkler head above it that never leaked.

The problem with this summer schedule at my church involved the huge and popular Sheraton resort nearby.  A couple would book one of the banquet rooms for their wedding reception and ask the wedding consultant if there was a pretty church nearby.  We had dozens of weddings.  Not bad for the pocketbook, but couples who “booked” their weddings because ours was a “pretty church nearby” were often less devout than we might have wished and came with priorities counter to many of the church’s teachings.  ‘Nuff said.

I might be scheduled to play ten or twelve weddings in July and August.  The church had a large and attractive electro-pneumatic organ with plenty of reeds, and any organist knows how important reeds are to the standard wedding repertory.  Think of all those eighteenth-century English trumpet tunes or that ubiquitous Mendelssohn march without reeds.  If it was eighty-degrees or less the organ sounded okay.  Much above that and the reeds couldn’t be used.  And I would not tune them in temperatures higher than chamber temperatures at Christmas or Easter, when the furnace was running for days on end and the organ got good and hot.  That was the limit.  I’m not willing to wreck seventy-five-thousand dollars worth of reeds for a wedding march.  On a really hot summer Sunday you can play a perfectly respectable worship service without using the reeds.

§

It’s a privilege for me to serve on the Board of Directors of the Friends of the Kotzschmar Organ (FOKO) in Portland, Maine.  It’s one of two instruments in the country with a Municipal Organist on the bench (Ray Cornils in Portland and Carol Williams in San Diego, California) and it’s a popular beloved civic icon.  It was built by Austin in 1912 – the centennial year is coming up – it has a hundred stops and five manuals.  The people of FOKO work diligently to maintain the instrument and present up to twenty concerts each year with a variety of international stars.  In addition the organ is used in performances of the Portland Symphony Orchestra, Choral Arts Society, and for many high school and college graduations each year.  You can see a full schedule of concerts, specifications of the organ, and information about educational activities at the website www.foko.org. 

Last week Stephen Tharp played a concert as part of the regular summer series.  His program included some wonderful twentieth-century music, a couple of the big classics, and his own transcription of The Fair from Stravinski’s Petrushka.  Stephen has been voted 2011 International Performer of the Year by the New York Chapter of the American Guild of Organists and will be presented in recital at the Church of St. Mary the Virgin in New York City as part of the Chapter’s annual President’s Day Conference next February.  This is the weekend before the beginning of Lent, a perfect time for a few days off between the high spots of the Liturgical Year.  Come to New York for the Conference.  You’ll hear great musicians playing great organs.  You can find details at www.nycago.org.

Stephen and his wife Lena stayed with Wendy and me for a couple nights after the concert and we had plenty of chance for shop-talk, carrying on about the state of organ teaching, performance, and building.  Much of our talk focused on the philosophy of performance – what do we try to accomplish when we perform, what are the benefits for the performer and the audience?  Many organists have two levels or venues for performance, worship and concert.  Are they the same? 

When we work from the organ bench on a Sunday morning, we are certainly trying to do our best, maybe even consciously hoping that the congregation (at least the personnel committee) is impressed.  But our challenge is to focus our skills and diligence to enable the fullest communication between the congregants and God.  It’s essential to do your very best, but it’s not appropriate for you to be feeding your ego. 

I’m reminded of a story from the Johnson White House.  President Johnson was presiding over a working lunch with members of congress and foreign dignitaries.  He asked his Press Secretary Bill Moyers (whose PhD. came from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Texas) to give a blessing as the meal began.  Moyers folded his hands, bowed his head, and began.  Johnson bellowed, “Speak up, I can’t hear you.”  Moyers replied, “Mr. President, I wasn’t addressing you.”

When we perform on a concert stage or in recital at the church on a Sunday afternoon, we are working to create a harmonic unity between composer, performer, audience, and instrument.  The performer who is inspired by the instrument and the music can bring the audience along on a magic carpet ride.  What’s the energy that makes the carpet fly?  It’s the energy that the performer draws from the experience and shares with everyone in the hall.  Have you ever attended a concert and found that you were exhausted when it was over?  That’s because the energy transmitted by the performer passed through your consciousness and body, sapping your energy in the process. 

Have you ever wondered about the word recital?  The dictionary in my Macbook says, “to read aloud or declaim from memory.”  It’s a standard word in our organ-lexicon, as well as those of singers, pianists, almost any solo musician.  If we get fussy about etymology, a recital by definition would not be an exciting event, but simply a retelling of something created in the past.  That would be essence of an “Urtext” performance – playing the music as the composer would have played it (to the best of our research and ability) on an organ that the composer would have recognized from a score presumed to be as authentic as possible.  It’s hard to fathom resisting the temptation to add any of yourself to that mix, and the best historically informed performances are those in which the player manages to inject his or her personality into the music, allowing the energy to flow, and projecting the excitement of the music.  Bach, Buxtehude, and Bruns were all great improvisers, and I bet their performances were bawdy and thrilling.  Bach would have been the master at slipping Happy Birthday to a violinist during an Offertory improvisation, no doubt in retrograde inversion and canon.

Using the strict definition, does a recital allow for any creativity?  Is the performer licensed to add to the material being recited?  Is the listener free to feel moved emotionally?  I remember the terror of being required to recite a few verses of a Longfellow poem in elementary school.  I was well into my thirties before I felt comfortable speaking before a large group. 

We’ve all heard thrilling renditions of the great classics of organ literature.  But haven’t we also heard boring, rote recitations of pieces when half the audience knows they could have done better?  Is that the best way to project our magnificent, thrilling, all encompassing instrument to the public?

As part of his concert on Tuesday, Stephen Tharp played Bach’s Toccata and Fugue in F Major.  That’s one of my life pieces – you know, those pieces you played for required student performances in school, the equivalent of final exams for Organ Performance majors.  I worked on it for months, did a harmonic theoretical analysis of it, memorized it, and offered the longest performance on record because of those traps Bach left us where if you change a B-natural to a B-flat you jump back sixty measures!  Stephen’s performance had none of that.  All he did was give us an energetic rendition, clearly defining the architectural structure of the piece, sharing the trickery of canon and triple-invertible counterpoint in the relative minor, using Bach’s toccata-flourishes as bridges that connected those mile-post pillars.  It was Bach’s music, clear as day, but it was Stephen’s performance.  As he played he showed us what he likes about the piece.  I like it that way.

Stephen along with many of our brilliant young players is blessed with tremendous technical facility, honed and nurtured by countless hours of practice.  I recall plenty of performances with enough shaky moments that I would worry as the player approached each treacherous passages.  It’s hard to enjoy a performance if you can’t trust the performer.  We are extremely fortunate to share the instrument with a growing breed of brilliant organist/musician/performers whose love of the instrument and musical instincts allow “just anyone” to appreciate the organ to the highest degree.

§

Be all you can be, but be who you are.
Tradition says that a symphony conductor mounts the podium with white tie and a cutaway jacket with tails.  In the nineteen-eighties, Seiji Ozawa startled the conservative blue-blood crowd in Boston with his trademark white turtleneck shirts.  Heresy.  I’m sure he wasn’t the first to break tradition on those exalted steps, but he sure made a noise.  In the nineteen-sixties and –seventies, E. Power Biggs and Virgil Fox carried on their celebrated feud, one in a tux, the other with sequins and a scarlet-lined black cape.  What does the performer’s dress have to do with the performance?  Does it make the music sound better?  Does it help the audience understand the depth and excitement of the music?  Does it help the performer define for his or her own self who and what is being given to the audience?  Does it honor the dignity and majesty of playing great masterworks in a huge acoustic space?

§

When the visit was ending I drove Stephen and Lena to the Portland International Jetport (international because of daily flights to Nova Scotia, jetport because they have jets!).  We stopped in Portland for lunch and dropped in to St. Luke’s Episcopal Cathedral to see the Skinner organ as restored by the A. Thompson-Allen Company of New Haven, Connecticut.  It’s a modest four-manual organ with forty-seven ranks that include seven ranks in the chapel at the rear of the nave that doubles as the Echo of the Chancel organ.  It’s a beautiful building, and the organ is a knock-out.  The Vox Angelica in the Echo absolutely disappears when the shutters are closed, and the full organ is a mighty blast of gorgeous tone.  The extreme range of volume and the possibility of truly seamless crescendo from the softest (imaginable) string to the thrilling fortissimo and back again are perhaps the most impressive facets of the wonderful organs built by Ernest Skinner.

As Stephen played through countless combinations of stops we reveled in the beauty of the sound.  But it was hot.  Remember, it was ninety-eight degrees outside.  It might have been five degrees cooler – or less hot – indoors, but it was hard to tell.  The organ sure knew it was hot.  The reeds, and especially the gorgeous harp, stayed right where they belonged, and the flues went to the heavens with a fiery tale.  No worries.  The stakes were not high, the organ sounded terrific, and we were the richer for the experience.  The Cathedral Musician, Albert Melton – my colleague on the FOKO board – was on vacation and the office staff welcomed us warmly.  Congratulations to Nick Thompson-Allen and Joe Dzeda and the staff of the Thompson-Allen Company for their wonderful work and obvious deep respect for Mr. Skinner.  Congratulations to Albert and the people of St Luke’s for their appreciation of the great artwork that is their organ.

Now let’s have some cooler weather.

In the wind…

September, 2011

We’re havin’ a heat wave.

It’s hot.  I’m writing in mid-July from the coast of Maine where we usually enjoy cool ocean breezes.  But records are being set.  It was ninety-eight degrees in Portland yesterday and it’s ninety-eight degrees at home today.  I said ocean, didn’t I.  That means humidity.  A few minutes ago, the meteorologist on the radio said the humidity is “about as high as it can go.”  Like most desk-days, I’m talking on the phone with people all over the country, and everyone says it’s terrible today.  Electric utilities are limiting power even though they’re dealing with record high demands.  Hospital emergency rooms are busier than normal.  Several of the church offices I tried to call today had messages on their phones saying they had closed early in order to save energy.

For fun (or longing) I looked at the website of the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to learn that while it’s ninety-eight here, it’s in the high sixties in Nome, Alaska and around seventy in Helena, Montana.  But it’s ninety in Detroit, a hundred-three in New York City and a hundred-four in Gilbertsville, PA.

All those organs sounding terrible.

Many churches have summer schedules during which the organ isn’t used much – a good thing because when the weather gets hot the pitch of flue pipes rises dramatically while the reeds stay right where they are.  I advise clients and resist temptation myself not to raise the pitch of reeds in the summer to match the rest of the organ.  That’s how tuning scrolls get wrecked – you roll them down “into the quick,” as if you were trying to get a carp out of a sardine can, to match the pitch of the flues.  Then in the winter when you try to get the reeds back to usual pitch the scrolls are torn.  When a tuning scroll is damaged and “leaks,” the speech of the pipe is compromised.

If your church has “Church School Sunday” on the first Sunday in June, then summer services in the air-conditioned chapel (pretty common in New England Protestant churches), you’re fine.  I played for almost twenty years at a church with exactly this schedule.  It was a delight because there was no choir in the summer, and the services were an hour earlier.  I was active in a sailing club in those days and we ran races every Sunday, so it was handy to be finished with church at ten-am.  We moved the church’s wonderful piano from the sanctuary to the chapel each year so I could play on a “real” instrument for the summer – a great opportunity to keep my fingers around my piano repertory.  The permanent instrument in the chapel was an aging and low-end electronic organ.  Something about it meant that every A# in all the “stops” was out of tune and the dealer/technician said it couldn’t be fixed.  There was a sprinkler head above it that never leaked.

The problem with this summer schedule at my church involved the huge and popular Sheraton resort nearby.  A couple would book one of the banquet rooms for their wedding reception and ask the wedding consultant if there was a pretty church nearby.  We had dozens of weddings.  Not bad for the pocketbook, but couples who “booked” their weddings because ours was a “pretty church nearby” were often less devout than we might have wished and came with priorities counter to many of the church’s teachings.  ‘Nuff said.

I might be scheduled to play ten or twelve weddings in July and August.  The church had a large and attractive electro-pneumatic organ with plenty of reeds, and any organist knows how important reeds are to the standard wedding repertory.  Think of all those eighteenth-century English trumpet tunes or that ubiquitous Mendelssohn march without reeds.  If it was eighty-degrees or less the organ sounded okay.  Much above that and the reeds couldn’t be used.  And I would not tune them in temperatures higher than chamber temperatures at Christmas or Easter, when the furnace was running for days on end and the organ got good and hot.  That was the limit.  I’m not willing to wreck seventy-five-thousand dollars worth of reeds for a wedding march.  On a really hot summer Sunday you can play a perfectly respectable worship service without using the reeds.

§

It’s a privilege for me to serve on the Board of Directors of the Friends of the Kotzschmar Organ (FOKO) in Portland, Maine.  It’s one of two instruments in the country with a Municipal Organist on the bench (Ray Cornils in Portland and Carol Williams in San Diego, California) and it’s a popular beloved civic icon.  It was built by Austin in 1912 – the centennial year is coming up – it has a hundred stops and five manuals.  The people of FOKO work diligently to maintain the instrument and present up to twenty concerts each year with a variety of international stars.  In addition the organ is used in performances of the Portland Symphony Orchestra, Choral Arts Society, and for many high school and college graduations each year.  You can see a full schedule of concerts, specifications of the organ, and information about educational activities at the website www.foko.org. 

Last week Stephen Tharp played a concert as part of the regular summer series.  His program included some wonderful twentieth-century music, a couple of the big classics, and his own transcription of The Fair from Stravinski’s Petrushka.  Stephen has been voted 2011 International Performer of the Year by the New York Chapter of the American Guild of Organists and will be presented in recital at the Church of St. Mary the Virgin in New York City as part of the Chapter’s annual President’s Day Conference next February.  This is the weekend before the beginning of Lent, a perfect time for a few days off between the high spots of the Liturgical Year.  Come to New York for the Conference.  You’ll hear great musicians playing great organs.  You can find details at www.nycago.org.

Stephen and his wife Lena stayed with Wendy and me for a couple nights after the concert and we had plenty of chance for shop-talk, carrying on about the state of organ teaching, performance, and building.  Much of our talk focused on the philosophy of performance – what do we try to accomplish when we perform, what are the benefits for the performer and the audience?  Many organists have two levels or venues for performance, worship and concert.  Are they the same? 

When we work from the organ bench on a Sunday morning, we are certainly trying to do our best, maybe even consciously hoping that the congregation (at least the personnel committee) is impressed.  But our challenge is to focus our skills and diligence to enable the fullest communication between the congregants and God.  It’s essential to do your very best, but it’s not appropriate for you to be feeding your ego. 

I’m reminded of a story from the Johnson White House.  President Johnson was presiding over a working lunch with members of congress and foreign dignitaries.  He asked his Press Secretary Bill Moyers (whose PhD. came from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Texas) to give a blessing as the meal began.  Moyers folded his hands, bowed his head, and began.  Johnson bellowed, “Speak up, I can’t hear you.”  Moyers replied, “Mr. President, I wasn’t addressing you.”

When we perform on a concert stage or in recital at the church on a Sunday afternoon, we are working to create a harmonic unity between composer, performer, audience, and instrument.  The performer who is inspired by the instrument and the music can bring the audience along on a magic carpet ride.  What’s the energy that makes the carpet fly?  It’s the energy that the performer draws from the experience and shares with everyone in the hall.  Have you ever attended a concert and found that you were exhausted when it was over?  That’s because the energy transmitted by the performer passed through your consciousness and body, sapping your energy in the process. 

Have you ever wondered about the word recital?  The dictionary in my Macbook says, “to read aloud or declaim from memory.”  It’s a standard word in our organ-lexicon, as well as those of singers, pianists, almost any solo musician.  If we get fussy about etymology, a recital by definition would not be an exciting event, but simply a retelling of something created in the past.  That would be essence of an “Urtext” performance – playing the music as the composer would have played it (to the best of our research and ability) on an organ that the composer would have recognized from a score presumed to be as authentic as possible.  It’s hard to fathom resisting the temptation to add any of yourself to that mix, and the best historically informed performances are those in which the player manages to inject his or her personality into the music, allowing the energy to flow, and projecting the excitement of the music.  Bach, Buxtehude, and Bruns were all great improvisers, and I bet their performances were bawdy and thrilling.  Bach would have been the master at slipping Happy Birthday to a violinist during an Offertory improvisation, no doubt in retrograde inversion and canon.

Using the strict definition, does a recital allow for any creativity?  Is the performer licensed to add to the material being recited?  Is the listener free to feel moved emotionally?  I remember the terror of being required to recite a few verses of a Longfellow poem in elementary school.  I was well into my thirties before I felt comfortable speaking before a large group. 

We’ve all heard thrilling renditions of the great classics of organ literature.  But haven’t we also heard boring, rote recitations of pieces when half the audience knows they could have done better?  Is that the best way to project our magnificent, thrilling, all encompassing instrument to the public?

As part of his concert on Tuesday, Stephen Tharp played Bach’s Toccata and Fugue in F Major.  That’s one of my life pieces – you know, those pieces you played for required student performances in school, the equivalent of final exams for Organ Performance majors.  I worked on it for months, did a harmonic theoretical analysis of it, memorized it, and offered the longest performance on record because of those traps Bach left us where if you change a B-natural to a B-flat you jump back sixty measures!  Stephen’s performance had none of that.  All he did was give us an energetic rendition, clearly defining the architectural structure of the piece, sharing the trickery of canon and triple-invertible counterpoint in the relative minor, using Bach’s toccata-flourishes as bridges that connected those mile-post pillars.  It was Bach’s music, clear as day, but it was Stephen’s performance.  As he played he showed us what he likes about the piece.  I like it that way.

Stephen along with many of our brilliant young players is blessed with tremendous technical facility, honed and nurtured by countless hours of practice.  I recall plenty of performances with enough shaky moments that I would worry as the player approached each treacherous passages.  It’s hard to enjoy a performance if you can’t trust the performer.  We are extremely fortunate to share the instrument with a growing breed of brilliant organist/musician/performers whose love of the instrument and musical instincts allow “just anyone” to appreciate the organ to the highest degree.

§

Be all you can be, but be who you are.
Tradition says that a symphony conductor mounts the podium with white tie and a cutaway jacket with tails.  In the nineteen-eighties, Seiji Ozawa startled the conservative blue-blood crowd in Boston with his trademark white turtleneck shirts.  Heresy.  I’m sure he wasn’t the first to break tradition on those exalted steps, but he sure made a noise.  In the nineteen-sixties and –seventies, E. Power Biggs and Virgil Fox carried on their celebrated feud, one in a tux, the other with sequins and a scarlet-lined black cape.  What does the performer’s dress have to do with the performance?  Does it make the music sound better?  Does it help the audience understand the depth and excitement of the music?  Does it help the performer define for his or her own self who and what is being given to the audience?  Does it honor the dignity and majesty of playing great masterworks in a huge acoustic space?

§

When the visit was ending I drove Stephen and Lena to the Portland International Jetport (international because of daily flights to Nova Scotia, jetport because they have jets!).  We stopped in Portland for lunch and dropped in to St. Luke’s Episcopal Cathedral to see the Skinner organ as restored by the A. Thompson-Allen Company of New Haven, Connecticut.  It’s a modest four-manual organ with forty-seven ranks that include seven ranks in the chapel at the rear of the nave that doubles as the Echo of the Chancel organ.  It’s a beautiful building, and the organ is a knock-out.  The Vox Angelica in the Echo absolutely disappears when the shutters are closed, and the full organ is a mighty blast of gorgeous tone.  The extreme range of volume and the possibility of truly seamless crescendo from the softest (imaginable) string to the thrilling fortissimo and back again are perhaps the most impressive facets of the wonderful organs built by Ernest Skinner.

As Stephen played through countless combinations of stops we reveled in the beauty of the sound.  But it was hot.  Remember, it was ninety-eight degrees outside.  It might have been five degrees cooler – or less hot – indoors, but it was hard to tell.  The organ sure knew it was hot.  The reeds, and especially the gorgeous harp, stayed right where they belonged, and the flues went to the heavens with a fiery tale.  No worries.  The stakes were not high, the organ sounded terrific, and we were the richer for the experience.  The Cathedral Musician, Albert Melton – my colleague on the FOKO board – was on vacation and the office staff welcomed us warmly.  Congratulations to Nick Thompson-Allen and Joe Dzeda and the staff of the Thompson-Allen Company for their wonderful work and obvious deep respect for Mr. Skinner.  Congratulations to Albert and the people of St Luke’s for their appreciation of the great artwork that is their organ.

Now let’s have some cooler weather.




Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Why is there air?


Published in The Diapason, November, 2005

Why is there air?
Forty years have passed since Bill Cosby raised this question in his recording by the same name.  The record (remember those black vinyl discs?) was released in 1965 and the title cut referred to his days as a Physical Education major at Temple University.  With tongue in cheek he teased philosophy majors, observing that they wandered around campus mulling over such fundamental questions.  I no longer own a turntable and couldn’t refresh my memory so I paraphrase his response:

“Any Phys-Ed major knows that.  There’s air to blow up basketballs, air to blow up footballs…” 

I was in elementary school at the time, and my friends and I thought that was the funniest thing ever, but forty years later the Wyman School has been converted to condominiums and I think I have a more sophisticated reading of what Mr. Cosby was getting at.  As our lives and society grow ever more complex we often lose track of the fundamental questions that drive what we do.

What are the questions?
Ours is a field rich with people who “caught the bug” – who were excited, even enchanted by the pipe organ early in life.  I’ve heard plenty of those personal stories.  One colleague told me how when he was very young his family traveled clear across the country to attend a wedding.  The trip itself was a huge experience for him, but he had never seen such a large and ornate church building, and when the organ started to play he knew what he wanted to do with his life.  Another friend told that when he was shown inside a large organ as a child the concept of the apparently contradictory relationship between the organ’s industrial interior and its glorious sound led to his important career as an organbuilder.   My own introduction to the instrument was a natural succession – the organist of the church I grew up in (my father was the rector) was a harpsichord maker and the community of instrument builders was well represented in the choir.  My childhood piano lessons led to organ lessons and why wouldn’t I have a summer job in an organbuilder’s workshop?  Was there in fact anything else one might do?

A wonderful world has grown up around the pipe organ, a world full of talented people dedicated to both the study of what has preceded us and to innovation.  It’s a complicated subject with a very deep history, myriad technical issues, and elusive artistic concepts that drive the whole thing.  The instrument itself is tangible – you can build it, touch it, feel it, play it, care for it.  But the basic concept is more difficult to explain.  This is not like the admiration directed toward the first person to eat an artichoke or lobster, rather it is the understanding of the collective contributions of countless people through the ages.  The intertwined relationship between the instrument, its music, its builders, and its players is like those quirky philosophical questions about trees in the forest, smoke and fire, chickens and eggs – or Bill Cosby’s why is there air?  Any organbuilder knows the answer to that question:  There’s air to blow organ pipes, air to leak through worn gaskets, air to cause ciphers.  We are the heirs of erring air.  (Remember E. Power Biggs talking about pumping the bellows of an 18th century British organ – “handling the handle that Händel handled.”) 

However lofty our introduction to the pipe organ, once we are engaged in our careers we often move from one deadline to another somehow forgetting that original inspiration.  We may know the thrilling sensation of a huge Swell box opening, allowing the sound of powerful reeds to gradually join the choir procession during a festival service.  (If the procession is slow and in the middle of the service, we could use the Swell box to gradually join a gradual Gradual!)  But what do we have in mind if we are in an organ chamber struggling to get a Swell motor to work properly – technical issues, skinned knuckles, and holed leather, or that spectacular procession, banners a’flying?  Try whistling a hymn tune as you work – I recommend Westminster Abbey!

The struggle between art and commerce is well defined and frequently written about.  A friend who loves to paint recently put it succinctly when she said she simply doesn’t have the time for it.  Who was it that said, “time is money?”  At what point does the thrill of creating a monumental pipe organ become a battle between time and money? 

I recently stumbled across a quotation from Daniel Barenboim: “Every great work of art has two faces, one toward its own time and one toward the future, toward eternity.”  Did Mr. Barenboim forget the past as a third face?  Aren’t great works of art at least informed by the past?  Certainly pipe organs are.

There’s a debate in the world of pleasure boats between the merits of wood and fiberglass hulls.  A purist might say there’s nothing like the sound of water slapping against a wooden hull.  But there are many arguments in favor of fiberglass boats.  Does this debate actually confuse questions of personal preference or convenience with whether or not it’s a good boat?

The debate between the merits of mechanical and electric keyboard actions has been raging for more than fifty years.  It seems to me that one can argue that the debate couldn’t really get started until electric and pneumatic actions were well-developed and prevalent so there was strong basis for comparison.  I’ve said many times that the result of the debate is that our organbuilders are producing excellent instruments using all kinds of actions.  The questions surrounding the construction of organ cases, the design of wind systems, or the deployment of stops in divisions are just as fundamental as those concerning keyboard action.  Let’s debate the relative merits of balanced or suspended tracker key actions, or whether the keyboards of electric action instruments should be pivoted in the middle or at the end.  My point is I want to play and listen to good organs, well conceived and beautifully made.  Just as I’ve had great days sailing in both wooden and fiberglass boats, I’ve been thrilled by both tracker and electric action pipe organs.

When I say I’ve been thrilled by both tracker and electric action pipe organs I have also to say that I’ve equally been disappointed by both. 

One thing that sets the pipe organ apart from other instruments in my opinion is the extraordinary variety from one example to another.  I know that a clarinetist recognizes countless differences between clarinets, but how can one compare a three-rank continuo organ with a mighty two-hundred-rank job in a huge church?  The experiences they produce are worlds apart as is the music that can be played on them?  (I’ve noticed that we often talk about what music an organ can play – as if there would not be an organist involved.)  What’s really funny is how we try to mix those experiences.  Widor’s famous Toccata is a staple of the modern organ repertory and it’s played as often on ten-stop organs as on those of the scale for which it was conceived – many, many more than ten stops.  And it’s not just about the number of stops but more important, the acoustics of the room.  I remember vividly the first time I played that piece in an appropriate acoustical setting.  It was in Lakewood, Ohio in a cavernous church building with a marble floor.  It was a Wicks organ of only moderate size but the way the harmonies rolled around the place helped me understand the piece more fully.  Of course, this was after I had played the same piece in perhaps dozens of small, dry rooms on dozens of small, dry organs.

It seems to me that our love affair with pieces like that has led us toward an artificial world.  We know that thirty-two foot stops add a lot to large-scale organ music, so we add artificial thirty-twos to organs in churches that do not have space for them.  Ideally, we design organs using mathematical formulas that have been proven through the ages.  The Golden Section, for example, is a classic system of ratios that defines the proportions of countless structures built over thousands of years.  There’s a pleasing naturalness when an instrument is conceived well in relationship to the room it graces.  Hearing thirty-two foot tone in a building with a fifteen foot ceiling leaves one somehow confused.

An organist’s work is often defined by the struggle between tradition and innovation.  Christmas is coming.  Are you preparing for the tenth, fifteenth, twentieth Christmas in the same church?  How do you program innovative exciting music without disappointing the expectations of tradition?  Think of the congregation that was first to sing O Come, All Ye Faithful (there must have been one).  Did anyone go home that day grumbling that the organist didn’t understand the value of tradition?  One piece that struck me at first hearing as a future chestnut is John Rutter’s Candlelight Carol.  Easily singable, absolutely beautiful, text full of meaning – I wonder if that’s what people experienced when they first heard In dulci jubilo some seven hundred years ago. 

I had a parallel musing the first time I visited St. Sulpice in Paris.  I wondered how many of the older people in the congregation would remember Marcel Dupré as their parish organist.  It’s a stretch, but it’s at least possible that a few of them remembered Widor – it was fewer than sixty-five years after his retirement.  Think what those people must have experienced in the way of musical tradition when so much of what they heard from the organ was improvised!

One of my greatest professional struggles has involved wedding music.  It’s the privilege of the parish organist to be a part of so many celebrations.  I played for more than four hundred weddings at one church.  It’s a thrill to be able to share one’s skills to enhance such an occasion.  I didn’t keep proper records but I would be fascinated to see a spreadsheet that showed a statistical analysis of the music I played at all those weddings.  At what percentage of weddings did I play Mendelssohn, Wagner, or Schubert?  How often did a couple listen to eight or ten choices before lighting up when I offered Jesu, Joy of Man’s Desiring the evening they were choosing music?  It’s very likely that the only time a couple actually chooses what will be played live on a pipe organ will be their wedding.  How does an organist introduce creative and meaningful music into a wedding service without disappointing the expectations of families and their friends?  When I was first an independent organbuilder I had as an employee a young woman who worked for me for nearly ten years.  She was both a terrific worker and a close friend.  She had many opportunities to hear my reports of “last Saturday’s wedding” when I would regale her with the trials of the wedding organist.  (Maybe there’s a movie title in that sentence.)  It is a great regret of mine that she formed such an impression of my feelings about weddings that when she got married she asked someone else to play the organ.

Is the future of the pipe organ better assured if we sustain tradition or if we find exciting new ways to use it?  How do we strike a balance between those concepts?  Are consumers of organ music always going to be happy with old favorites?  How do we find, write, create those pieces that will become tomorrow’s chestnuts or are today’s chestnuts good enough to last?  And if we find such a piece, how do we introduce it in the place of something else? 

What is the future form of the pipe organ?  Can its builders stay faithful to ancient forms while continuing to be innovative? 

What is the future of the economics of organbuilding?  Will churches, schools, concert halls always be willing to commit to such enormous expenditures?  Does our society value artistic expression enough to justify that?  How do we share our passion and enthusiasm in the interest of the future of our art?  Do we assume that a strong future for our art will add to the cultural wealth of society?  How can we sustain the wealth of the heritage of our instrument in the world of the sound-bite, the mega-byte, the Big Gulp®, the Big Mac®, the Playstation®, VCR, DVD, or PCD.  With music education in public schools in decline, who will be the next generation of organists and who will be the next generation of music lovers?

We are stewards of a glorious heritage.  It’s essential that we find new ways to communicate that wealth.  We must be informed by the past, but we shouldn’t dwell on it.  As we are informed by the past, we are better able to inform the future.  How many ways can we read the phrase, The Past Becomes the Future?

Monday, October 24, 2011

Fall in Lincoln County

This morning brought a nice quiet time on the heels of months of travel, hectic schedules, and thrilling work.  We live on the Damariscotta River, a twelve-mile long tidal estuary (much like Norway's fjords).  We are eight miles from the ocean, and three miles from the twin villages of Newcastle and Damariscotta, on the west shore.  At our dock the tides average around 10 1/2 feet - the difference of water level between high and low tide.  There are seasonal and lunar high tides as big as 12 feet.

In the last moments of August this year, Hurricane Irene came up the east coast of the United States.  The National Weather Service predicted that the storm would come through our region at full strength, so we brought in all the outdoor furniture, and put away kayaks and canoes, and brought the motor-boat close to shore on the inner float, and laid on some extra fenders and dock lines.  The brunt of the storm blasted unexpectedly through Vermont and Upstate New York causing catastrophic and unprecedented damage especially in remote and rural areas, but the outskirts of the storm came through Newcastle whipping the place up for 36 hours, but thankfully causing little damage.

That storm was followed by a trip to Bermuda during which my colleague Amory Atkins and I finished an organ that the Organ Clearing House had installed in June for St. Paul's AME Church in Hamilton.  We returned a day late from that trip because Tropical Storm Maria caused the airport and ports to be closed in Bermuda, and from there we whipped through a series of trips and small projects - meaning that until yesterday we didn't have a chance to use the boat.

Yesterday Wendy and I went up the river in the boat just to get out - our excuse was to pick up the Sunday New York Times at the Maine Coast Book Shop.  And this morning, I drove the boat up the river to the public landing in Damariscotta to meet Scott from Broad Cove Marine Service who hauls the boat, winterizes it, and stores it for us until launch-day in the spring.  Wendy met me in town so we could transfer all the gear (lines, life jackets, anchor, etc.) into the car.

The ride up river was a nice opportunity to reflect on a long and busy summer and fall.  I saw six loons, all in their winter plumage.  Each of the Osprey nests was occupied by a Greater Black Back Gull - the osprey have gone south for the winter.  And there was a big population of seals running around near the oyster farm - no doubt finding lots to eat.




The water in our river is teeming with life, and in the warmer months when water temperature is above 60-degrees, it's full of algae and plankton - so it's very cloudy.  But today with the water temperature low enough to kill off the microscopic plants, the water is clear.  It was still and smooth, and besides the seals, my boat was the only motion.  A lovely way to start a day and end a season.

See in these photos Newcastle Harbor, the public dock and landing in Damariscotta, and our trusty runabout ready for winter storage.

See you in the spring.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Casavant Organ in Princeton, NJ - Available NOW!



For the first forty years of its history, the Organ Clearing House worked mostly with the relocation of organs built in the nineteenth century.  Our records show dozens of lovely smaller instruments by builders like Hook & Hastings, Johnson, Jardine, and Hutchings.  At the time when OCH was founded (1961), the most venerable and desirable of those organs were barely a hundred years old – and many were barely fifty.

Now when we place an organ built in 1860 we’re acutely aware that it’s over a hundred-fifty years old, that much more a treasure, and that much more fragile.

The style of the time created an active market for ten-stop tracker organs.  It’s our observation that the ever-burgeoning digital substitutes have taken much of that market, and the market for vintage pipe organs is becoming increasingly upscale.  In the last several years we’ve had significant success relocating larger electro-pneumatic instruments from the early decades of the twentieth century. 

Our American pipe organ renaissance, the much celebrated Revival of Classic Organbuilding born in the 1950’s and 1960’s, active through the end of the twentieth century and continuing today has produced hundreds of wonderful American instruments with mechanical action based on the best of earlier European traditions.  That movement is still new enough that relatively few instruments built during that period have been offered for sale.

The Casavant Organ in Princeton, NJ is an outstanding example of that renaissance.  It is being offered for sale not because of faults or lack of quality, but because the music program of that prominent Episcopal parish is now firmly based on the “English Cathedral” tradition. The Choir has moved back to the chancel at the east end and the organ is located at the west end – acoustically 2 rooms away.”

The organ is housed in handsome oak cases and offers a range of Principal Choruses, solo and chorus reeds, and a broad palette of mutation flutes.  It is perfectly suited for the performance of German and French baroque music, and the expressive swell box allows a wide range of romantic effects along with enhancing usefulness as an accompanimental instrument.

The organ is available now.  We invite you to be in touch to arrange an audition visit.  The price will be negotiated to reflect both the high quality of the instrument and the church’s desire to sell it.

The Organ Clearing House is offering full relocation services.
To see the stoplist and more information, please visit www.organclearinghouse.net and see #2126.










Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Skinner’s early earnest days and the organ at Williams College, Williamstown, MA.

In 1911, the Skinner Organ Company of Boston, Massachusetts built nine organs.  As the company produced thirteen organs in 1909, this may seem a regression of production, but it’s interesting to note that of the nine organs built in 1911, five had four manuals, three had three manuals, and only one was a two-manual instrument of modest size.  These eleven instruments were installed in churches and schools in Seattle, Hartford, San Francisco, Washington DC, Lake George NY, Fall River and Williamstown MA.  When measured against the output of modern organbuilding companies, this is extraordinary output for a company roughly ten years old.

This was the period of some of Skinner’s most famous early organs such as those at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine and St. Thomas’ Church, both in New York, and the much admired instrument at Fourth Presbyterian Church in Chicago, IL.  Many of Skinner’s tonal innovations date from this period including Flute Celeste, Gamba Celeste, English Horn, Flugel Horn, French Trumpet, and 32’ Violone.  The Skinner Harp and Celesta was first introduced in the 1909 organ for Sage Chapel at Cornell University. 

Ernest and Mable Skinner were married in 1893.  Their third child, Ruth, was born in 1906, so this period of the advancing maturity and productivity of the Skinner Organ Company was concurrent with an active and dynamic family life, though daughter Ruth later noted that “Papa” was on the road most of the time.  Ernest purchased his first automobile in 1907 and instantly began a driving career sprinkled with admonitions for excessive speed, and at least one documented accident involving a tree in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a broken rib.  Ernest was among the first to own a speedboat on Lake Winnipesaukee in New Hampshire, and also among the first to win a speedboat race.  In 1917, Ernest Skinner’s love of adventure led to his first flight, 2500 feet above San Francisco Bay with his friend, pioneering pilot J. B. Struble of Oakland, CA.  (Biographical information offered from The Life and Work of Ernest M. Skinner, Dorothy Holden, The Organ Historical Society, 1987.)

The Skinner organ in Chapin Hall, Williams College, Williamstown, MA comprises nearly seventy ranks and was installed in a chamber above and behind the stage of the thousand-seat concert hall.  The replete and complete instrument sports massive stops including a full-length wood Double Open Diapason (22” square inside), an independent 32’ Bourdon (not extended from the 16’ Bourdon!), and a 16’ Tuba (83 notes) enclosed in the Solo with wood resonators for the bottom octave.  The stoplist includes French Horn, English Horn, a long list of characteristic string ranks, along with the expected Diapasons, Flutes, and Chorus Reeds.

The organ was severely damaged by a vandal in the mid-nineteen-sixties and never played again.

In the spring of 2011 the school was planning a renovation of Chapin Hall to include a new HVAC system that would be installed in the space currently occupied by the organ which would be demolished by the general contractor.  Members of the faculty of the Music Department raised the question of salvaging the organ.  Together we hatched a plan to dismantle the organ and ship it to Warrensburg, MO to the workshops of Quimby Pipe Organs who would store it until a new home with appropriate restoration could be located.

Quimby Pipe Organs and Williams College have provided funding for the reclamation of the instrument, damaged as it is.  Thanks and admiration to them for their magnanimity on behalf of America’s heritage of organbuilding.  On June 27, 2011, the staff of the Organ Clearing House began dismantling the organ, sharing the building with dozens of contractors and tradesmen as the building’s renovation was already well under way. 

Today, July 12, 2011, the OCH crew is loading the first of two tractor-trailers for shipment of the organ to Warrensburg.

The organ can be completely restored and is offered to any institution that can provide the resources for the restoration of this magnificent instrument.  It is a rare example of the early work of one of the greatest artists and innovators in the history of organbuilding, built in the wildly productive years at the end of the firm’s first decade.

We welcome your inquiries.
John Bishop
617-688-9290.